Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

EFFECT OF SURFACE TREATMENT METHODS ON THE SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN CEMENT TO ZIRCONIA CERAMIC

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 45±Ç 6È£ p.743 ~ 752
ÀÌÈ£Á¤, ½Å»ó¿Ï, ·ùÀçÁØ, Sub Kyu-Won,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÈ£Á¤ ( Lee Ho-Jeong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³
½Å»ó¿Ï ( Shin Sang-Wan ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç
·ùÀçÁØ ( Ryu Jae-Jun ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ÀÇ·á¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
 ( Sub Kyu-Won ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³

Abstract


Statement of problem: The aims of the study were to evaluate the effect of current surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of a resin composite luting cement bonded to ceramic surfaces and to identify the optimum cement type.

Material and Methods : The sixty zirconia ceramic specimens(10 per group) with EVEREST milling machine and 60 tooth block were made. The zirconia ceramic surface was divided into two groups according to surface treatment: (1) airborne abrasion with $110{\mu}m$ aluminum oxide particles; (2) Rocatec system, tribochemical silica coating. The zirconia ceramic specimens were cemented to tooth block using resin cements. The tested resin cements were Rely X ARC, Panavia F and Superbond C&B. Each specimen was mount in a jig of the universal testing machine for shear strength. The results were subjected to 2-way ANOVA and Post hoc tests was performed using Tukey, Scheffe, and Bonferroni test.

Results: The mean value of shear bond strength(MPa) were as follows: $$RelyXARC(+Al_2O_3),5.35{\pm}1.69$$; $$RelyXARC(+Rocatec),8.50{\pm}2.13$$; $$PanaviaF(+Al_2O_3),9.58{\pm}1.13$$; $$PanaviaF(+Rocatec),12.98{\pm}1.71$$; $$SuperbondC&B(+Al_2O_3)8.27{\pm}2.04$$; $$SuperbondC&B(+Rocatec),14.46{\pm}2.39$$. There was a significant increase in the shear bond strength when the ceramic surface was subjected to the tribochemical treatment(Rocatec 3M) in all cement groups(P<0.05). Bonding strengths of cements applied to samples treated with $Al_2O_3$ were compared; Rely X ARC showed the lowest values, whereas Panavia F cement showed higher value than that of Superbond C&B group with no statistical significance. When the bond strength of cements with of Rocatec treatment was compared, Rely X ARC showed lowest values. Overall, it was apparent that tribochemical treated Super-Bond possessed higher mean bond strength (14.46MPa; P<0.05) than that of Panavia F cement group with no significance.

Conclusion: Silica coating followed silanization(Rocatec treatment) increase the bond strength between resin cement and zirconia ceramic. Panavia F containing phosphate monomer and Superbond C&B comprised of 4-META tend to bond chemically with zirconia ceramic, thus demonstrating higher bond strength compared to BisGMA resin cement. Superbond C&B has shown to have highest value of bonding strength to zirconia ceramic after Rocatec treatment compared to other cement.

Å°¿öµå

Zirconia ceramic;Bond strength;Surface treatment;Resin cement

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed